Running Shoes: Top Alternatives to the New Balance 860 and How to Choose

What Shoe Is Comparable to the New Balance 860?

The New Balance 860 is a quintessential stability running shoe engineered for moderate to severe overpronation, offering a reliable blend of support and moderate cushioning for daily training. Comparable models from other brands typically share these core attributes, providing necessary support for overpronating runners in a durable, workhorse package.

Understanding the New Balance 860

The New Balance 860 series has long been a cornerstone in the stability running shoe category. It is specifically designed to address overpronation, a common biomechanical phenomenon where the foot rolls excessively inward during the gait cycle. The 860 achieves this stability through a combination of technologies, primarily a medial post (a firmer density foam on the arch side of the midsole) that resists excessive inward rolling, alongside a structured upper and a moderate amount of cushioning.

Key Features of the New Balance 860:

• Stability: Utilizes a medial post or similar stability technology to control overpronation.
• Cushioning: Offers a balanced level of cushioning, typically responsive and protective without being overly soft or plush.
• Durability: Built as a daily trainer, designed to withstand high mileage and regular use.
• Fit: Often provides a secure midfoot and comfortable toe box, accommodating various foot shapes.
• Purpose: Ideal for daily runs, long-distance training, and runners seeking reliable support.

Key Characteristics for Comparison

When seeking a shoe comparable to the New Balance 860, it's essential to analyze specific characteristics that define its performance and suitability for certain runners. These are the attributes to look for in alternative models:

• Stability Mechanism: The primary feature is a method to control overpronation. This could be a traditional medial post, guide rails (like Brooks' GuideRails), a J-Frame (like Hoka), or a dynamic support system.
• Cushioning Level: The 860 provides moderate cushioning. Comparable shoes should offer a similar balance—enough shock absorption for comfort and protection, but not so much that it feels overly soft or sacrifices responsiveness.
• Heel-to-Toe Drop: Most stability daily trainers, including the 860, typically feature a moderate heel-to-toe drop (e.g., 8mm to 10mm).
• Intended Use: The 860 is a workhorse daily trainer. Comparable shoes should also be suitable for regular, high-mileage running rather than being specialized for racing or speed work.
• Runner Profile: Designed for runners with moderate to severe overpronation who require structured support.

Top Comparable Running Shoes

Based on these characteristics, several running shoes from other leading brands offer a similar experience and level of support to the New Balance 860.

• Brooks Adrenaline GTS:

  • Comparison: This is arguably the most direct competitor to the New Balance 860. The Adrenaline GTS is Brooks' flagship stability shoe, utilizing their innovative GuideRails Holistic Support System. Instead of a traditional medial post, GuideRails help keep excess movement in check by guiding the foot and knee into proper alignment, reducing stress.
  • Similarities: Both are highly reliable daily trainers with moderate cushioning, built for overpronators seeking consistent support and durability.
  • Differences: The support mechanism differs (GuideRails vs. medial post), which can lead to a slightly different feel underfoot. Some runners find GuideRails less intrusive.

• Saucony Guide:

  • Comparison: The Saucony Guide is another long-standing stability staple that provides reliable support for overpronators. It typically employs a medial support system to control pronation and offers a balanced cushioning experience.
  • Similarities: Both are daily training shoes with a focus on stability and a responsive yet protective ride. They often share a similar heel-to-toe drop.
  • Differences: Saucony's cushioning (e.g., PWRRUN) might have a slightly different feel than New Balance's Fresh Foam X, and the specific geometry of the stability element can vary.

• ASICS GT-2000:

  • Comparison: The ASICS GT-2000 series is a popular choice for runners needing stability, sitting below the more structured Kayano. It uses ASICS' DUOMAX support system (a firmer foam on the medial side) combined with GEL technology for cushioning.
  • Similarities: Both are classic stability trainers designed for everyday mileage, offering a blend of support and cushioning for overpronators.
  • Differences: The ASICS GEL cushioning provides a distinct feel, often perceived as slightly firmer or more "pillowy" in specific areas compared to New Balance's foam. The stability approach, while similar in principle, has its own nuances.

• Mizuno Wave Inspire:

  • Comparison: The Mizuno Wave Inspire utilizes Mizuno's signature Wave Plate technology, which acts as both a cushioning and stability element. The specific shape of the "Fan Wave" helps to control pronation by resisting inward collapse.
  • Similarities: Like the 860, the Inspire is a durable daily trainer for overpronators, providing a stable and somewhat responsive ride.
  • Differences: The Wave Plate gives Mizuno shoes a unique, often firmer and more "snappy" ride compared to foam-based stability systems. Some runners prefer this distinct feel.

How to Choose the Right Stability Shoe

While these shoes are comparable, individual biomechanics and preferences play a critical role in finding the perfect fit.

• Professional Gait Analysis: The most effective way to determine your pronation needs and find suitable footwear is to undergo a gait analysis at a specialized running store. Experts can observe your foot strike and movement patterns to recommend appropriate stability levels.
• Try Before You Buy: Always try on multiple pairs and, if possible, take them for a short run on a treadmill or around the store. Pay attention to how the arch support feels, the cushioning, and whether your foot feels securely held without being constricted.
• Consider Your Running Goals: While all these shoes are daily trainers, subtle differences in cushioning and responsiveness might make one more appealing for longer runs versus shorter, quicker efforts.
• Foot Shape and Arch Height: Even within the same stability category, shoes can vary in their last (the mold the shoe is built around) and how they accommodate different foot shapes and arch heights.

Important Considerations for Runners

Choosing the right shoe is a crucial step, but it's part of a larger strategy for injury prevention and performance.

• Shoe Rotation: Consider rotating between two or more pairs of shoes, even if they are similar. This can extend the lifespan of each pair and allow different muscle groups to be engaged, potentially reducing repetitive stress injuries.
• When to Replace Shoes: Running shoes typically last between 300-500 miles, but this can vary based on your weight, running style, and terrain. Pay attention to signs of wear, such as decreased cushioning, breakdown of the outsole, or new aches and pains.
• Beyond the Shoe: Remember that shoes are only one component of a healthy running practice. Incorporate strength training, flexibility work, proper nutrition, and adequate rest to support your body and optimize your running performance.